I realize this many times a day--my thoughts are flying everywhere and my attention is scattered amongst five, six, seven different things. And when I realize this, I decide that what I need to do is take a moment to re-center. More than that, though (and I touched on this in my previous post), I'm interested in making lifestyle changes to bolster my decision to not multi-task to the point of overwhelming my mind and spirit.
I decided that for lent (which begins next Wednesday) I'm going to practice the spiritual discipline in simplicity as it pertains to time. Specifically, I'm going to try and live my life through the lens of single-mindedness. Rather than allowing myself to be swept away by the waves of information that are constantly approaching me, I am going to choose to live slowly, purposefully. I think there are benefits of different sorts that can come from such a practice. One thing in which I am specifically interested, though, is thinking about time and my placement within time. Learning to exist within time as the original agent of movement rather than being an object upon which time is subjected interests me. Rather than feeling as if my life and actions are dictates or confined by time, I am interested to see how my views of time can be altered. Rather than trying to manipulate my time so as to achieve more of what I believe I should be attaining, I will try and live simply within the time I am given. This quote by Kathleen Norris, author of several books on Benedictine Monasticism and living purposefully, expresses an alternate view of time, one which I would like to learn to embody:
"In our culture, time can seem like an enemy; it chews us up
and spits us out with appalling ease. But the monastic perspective welcomes
times as a gift from God, and seeks to put it to good use rather than allowing
us to be used up by it. The Benedictines, more than any other people I know,
insist that there is time in each day for prayer, for work, for study, and for
play. Liturgical time is essentially poetic time, oriented toward process rather
than productivity, willing to wait attentively in stillness rather than always
pushing to 'get the job done.'"
and spits us out with appalling ease. But the monastic perspective welcomes
times as a gift from God, and seeks to put it to good use rather than allowing
us to be used up by it. The Benedictines, more than any other people I know,
insist that there is time in each day for prayer, for work, for study, and for
play. Liturgical time is essentially poetic time, oriented toward process rather
than productivity, willing to wait attentively in stillness rather than always
pushing to 'get the job done.'"
The key, I believe, is this orientation toward process rather than holding an obsession with productivity. In a deeper sense, I am interested in examining why it is that I am prone to allow myself to be distracted constantly. When I look at society as a whole, I wonder what it is that we are searching for, what is it that is being fulfilled (or what is it we're hoping will be fulfilled) by all this information and activity? Are we distracting ourselves? Is that a bad thing? Are we filling silences?
But before I can continue thinking about these questions on a large-scale, I think I need to examine myself. It's easy to look at those surrounding me, and of course, I need to understand my socialization and the trends of society that have played a large part in shaping my habits. But examining my own motives is the key to awareness and change. So let me ask the above questions of myself: what am I hoping to fulfill through my effort to always be active? What am I training my brain to do and to expect? I've read enough research that I understand a bit of the science behind stimulation, gratification, and the interplay between the mind and the internet. And I can understand that I am not above that whole shebang. But beyond the obvious gratifications, what are the deeper catalysts that are propelling me toward busyness and distraction?
Thus begins my preparation for this lenten exercise.
No comments:
Post a Comment